Repartir dinero de la comunidad de propietarios

The fact that it was approved by a majority of the members isn't an assurance of its legality. If the decision is in violation of the law, any person who opposed it has the right to contest the decision, almost with a 100% chance of the outcome.

And the arrangement they've signed in their Community could be to be challenged. If defaulters are required to settle their debt, the amount is the property of the Community not to only a handful of its members. The money can only be distributed to them by a majority agreement.

The fact that it was approved by a majority of the members isn't an assurance of its legality. If the decision is in violation of the law, any person who opposed it has the right to contest the decision, almost with a 100% chance of the outcome.

And the arrangement they've signed in their Community could be to be challenged. If defaulters are required to settle their debt, the amount is the property of the Community not to only a handful of its members. The money can only be distributed to them by a majority agreement.

Now its time to avail of the services of <a href="https://mixthometutor.com/Best-Home-Tutors-in -Lahore/">Best Home Tutors in Lahore Best Home Tutors in Lahore</a>, click for more information.

Si la reunión se ha aprobado por mayoría y todos están conformes, no hay ilegalidad alguna.

Que lo haya aprobado la mayoría no es garantía de legalidad. Si la decisión va en contra de la legalidad, cualquiera que haya votado en contra puede impugnar el acuerdo, con prácticamente total garantía de éxito.

Y el acuerdo que han tomado en su Comunidad puede ser impugnado. Cuando se ha obligado a los morosos a saldar su deuda, ese dinero es de la Comunidad y no de unos pocos de sus miembros. Sólo se podría repartir entre ellos con un acuerdo por unanimidad.

Lo que no acabo de entender es que la sentencia les obligara a pagar la anualidad en curso y las 3 anteriores. Esa cantidad es la que es exigible a un nuevo propietario en caso de adquirir una propiedad con deudas. Si no se trata de un nuevo propietario, la cantidad exigible es la que no haya prescrito. Y esta cantidad podría alcanzar la totalidad de la deuda, sin límite temporal, en caso de que la Comunidad hubiera reclamado, incluso extrajudicialmente, año a año, las cantidades adeudadas. Pero bueno, imagino que faltan datos, porque es un asunto juzgado.

The decision to distribute the recovered funds among the 14 active residents appears both fair and reasonable, given their significant financial contributions over the years. This approach not only acknowledges and compensates for their efforts in maintaining the community but also adheres to a democratic process, as it was approved by a majority vote at a meeting of owners. Ensuring that 10% of the annual budget remains in the reserve fund demonstrates prudent financial management, maintaining the community's fiscal health while addressing past inequities. To solidify the legality and fairness of this decision, consulting with a legal expert and reviewing the community's bylaws is advisable, ensuring all actions comply with any tuition centers in peshawar that teaches cieany tuition centers in peshawar that teaches cie local property and cooperative regulations. Overall, this decision reflects a well-considered balance between compensating committed residents and safeguarding the community's financial stability.